I suppose that by now you’d have to think he believes the rubbish he spews forth. Its that old British Empire mentality that if you shout louder at the idiots .. then they will understand what it is you are lying to them about. My grandfather had it, if you were black, brown or yellow you just had to be shouted at, louder. The real problem with this King, is with his god. Everything the King says about his god tells me that, in theory, we have the same god and that therefore we also have the same moral base. Its a problem, don’t you think? I mean its fine to shout about your gods exclusive heavenly properties to those who may not be the same colour as you, or wear different clothes, but when you’re shouting at those that do know your god, despite the evil veils one would dress her in, then perhaps you are only shouting to hear your own voice. So, what do we do when a King is corrupting our god and deafening us with his lies? We either throw out the King or we throw out the god.

Me? I threw out kings gods a long long time ago and I threw out a belief in Kings and Divine Right way before that, even before I knew the full quality of this Kings god. (Brave children, don’t throw me back into the hands of either Kings or gods, I don’t want them, I don’t need them … Do you really think you do?). You see were not supposed to do this anymore .. mix Gods with Kings, especially if we have kings that interpret their gods moral precepts in a way that is in direct opposition to those ‘other’s’ who may believe in what the King says is the same god, but who cannot find this Kings god within their souls – nor in the places that the King says we should find her.

I suppose that there’s something secret, something hidden away about the kings god, something exclusive, something even British Empire about her that allows the King to lie continually about her qualities. He must believe that she will have mercy upon him when he is sitting at her righthand. That once he has done her bidding and created heaven on earth he will forever live on in her divine right – corrupted moral base or not. Thats the problem .. a kings corrupted moral base must be shared with his god. We should not mix priests and kings.

It appears obvious that this King, Scott Morrison, doesn’t believe that the definition of corruption will ever be in the hands of people who may believe in a different god, or who may examine the Kings god’s moral dictates and therefore hold them up in comparison to the King moral corruption – his corruption of human rights and law, both divine and secular has no importance, he says, he says it sits well with his god – which he tells us is our god too. Not only must he believe that the moral corruption of his gods design is good for him, that it works in his favour, but he must also be certain that the definition of corruption isn’t defined by any other than himself and his god .. and that it will never be made retrospective. This is our Kings biggest problem – a public that knows his god better than he does but whom he tells, can’t know his god without his guidance.

… Lord, Suicide Radio just broke in while I’m rambling on about suicidal life. Likes, they’re talking about .. Christ, likes. I thought they were talking about lights. The question was ‘is it possible that social media (they say the internet because to them that is the internet) could survive, could it work, without lights?’ So I’m chewing on terminology, cant, and drifting off into what I think is a technical question of science which could be highly interesting and maybe important, and they’re talking about Likes. Shoot me. … Guidance required.
If a king believes this about his god – that only he knows the true workings of his god but that it is the same god as ours – and his life is ruled by his god, as he says, then this can’t be very good for any of us who aren’t ruled by his god now can it? Even if we believe that the Kings god is the same as ours. I suppose that like he says, we are just not yet enlightened. I’m not sure that Kings actually appreciate enlightenment as its always going to encroach on their interpretations of God .. or at least on the way they like to tell us that their God is showing us her appreciation.

So I’m not very happy with the current king’s god. If she can condone all the lying, the cheating and the stealing that he says is guided by her, if its okay with her that the King can hurt other people in our name, deny open and fair education, can take from our earth without need …. Oh, what’s this, breaking news .. our brave King’s just been egged by a young lady .. well done young lady. Thats the way.
The King says, she’s a thug, left wing activist and he’s had her charged with common assault – bully that he is. Nothing common about it, its an outcome of the deceitful but divine attempt at replacing Democracy with Fascism. The King should let his god punish the young lady, after all she’s Australia’s future.

Bigotry and oppression are inherent in divine right and its been said that all oppression began with monotheism .. so, if it really is true that the King is true to his one and only god … Then she must be one evil & ignorant bitch, eh?

“Your moral compass must fall on the side of economics and not on the side of humanity.” – David Littleproud (The Nats would be king, whose fiefdom I’m a roamin).